Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Decline in value "Who qualifies?"
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
- Public finance
- Living
- Nature and Environment
Begin date
Contact information
Link to publication website
Responsible use
Goal and impact
There are three algorithms used when assessing a valuation application. For the readability of this page, we refer to these algorithms as ''control algorithms''. The different control algorithms are explained below:
- Duplicate algorithm: this algorithm checks whether an application for depreciation has been submitted before. If an application has been submitted before, the application is automatically rejected.
- Postcode check algorithm: This algorithm checks whether the property's postcode falls within the depreciation area. This is the area in which properties may be located that have decreased in value due to gas extraction. If the property is not within the depreciation area, the application is automatically rejected.
- NAM algorithm: this algorithm checks whether compensation has been granted to a property by the Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM) in the past. If this is the case, a new application is rejected.
The impact of all algorithms is that an application is rejected if it does not meet the algorithm's conditions. The automatic rejection of an application is thus based on facts.
Considerations
The verification algorithms ensure that all applications for depreciation that should be considered can really be processed. The duplicate algorithm is necessary because the IMG has no authority under the law to consider a duplicate application. This is the case when a person has made a previous application for decrease in value at a particular property for the period he has been an owner, and it has been assessed.
In addition, the postcode algorithm is designed to ensure that only people who are entitled to do so can apply. The valuation area has been carefully created. Based on the earthquake history in the earthquake area, the area has been determined. This means that for certain postcode areas, it has been determined that the properties within these postcode areas are eligible for depreciation compensation. The postcode algorithm is relevant because it checks whether the property falls within the depreciation area.
The NAM algorithm is then relevant because it is clear from the law that the IMG may not process applications for which NAM has paid compensation in the past. This also applies to depreciation applications.
Human intervention
The control algorithms are not controlled by a human. The algorithms are based on facts. Inputting them will always lead to the same outcome ("postcode is or is not in the depreciation area"). Control by a human is therefore not necessary for the deployment of these algorithms.
Risk management
We evaluate the risks in accordance with our privacy policy. Based on this evaluation of, we take or adjust additional measures. The next update for the risks of this algorithm is scheduled for in Q4 2024.
Legal basis
Duplicate check and postcode check: Article 2(3)(a) under 2 Temporary Groningen Act: IMG's task and authority is to deal with damage and, to that end, to determine entitlement to compensation for damage.
NAM control: Article 2 paragraph 4 sub b Temporary Groningen Act: The IMG is not authorised to deal with a claim for compensation if it concerns damage for which a settlement agreement has been concluded by the operator with the victim or the victim's representative.
Links to legal bases
- Artikel 2 lid 4 Tijdelijke wet Groningen: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0043252/2023-07-01#Hoofdstuk2
- Artikel 2 lid 3 Tijdelijke wet Groningen: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0043252/2023-07-01#Hoofdstuk2
Link to Processing Index
Elaboration on impact assessments
A DPIA has been carried out on the Valuation Drop Scheme.
No Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment has been carried out on the Valuation Drop Calculation Method because the Calculation Method is not a high-risk AI system. This is because the algorithm does not meet the definition of an AI system because the algorithm cannot be said to act independently.
Impact assessment
Operations
Data
Postcode check: postcode of the property for which the application is submitted.
Duplicate check: postcode and house number of the property for which the application is submitted.
NAM check: name and date of sale of the applicant.
Technical design
Postcode algorithm: in the algorithm, the postcode list for the value reduction area is known. When a postcode is given as input, the algorithm indicates whether the postcode is on the postcode list for the value reduction area or not. If the postcode is not on the postcode list, the application is rejected.
Duplicate algorithm: the algorithm is trained with all applications for compensation due to decrease in value. When an application is given as input, the algorithm indicates whether the Institute has dealt with this application before or not. If the application has been dealt with before, the application is rejected.
NAM algorithm: the algorithm is trained with all compensations ever paid out by NAM. When an application is given as input, the algorithm indicates whether the property from this application is on NAM's compensation list or not. If the application appears on the compensation list, the application is rejected.
Similar algorithm descriptions
Transit address profile National Approach to Address Quality (LAA)
National Authority for Identity Data
The algorithm selects residential addresses on which there were many registrations in the past period: there may be doubts as to whether actual removals have taken place.Last change on 27th of May 2024, at 12:05 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Pursuant to the Participation Act, our municipality has to check the legitimacy of the benefit payments during their term. For this purpose, Midden-Groningen municipality uses the services of the national Intelligence Bureau in addition to the social investigation task force.Last change on 10th of January 2025, at 16:25 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
- To determine whether you are entitled to benefits, the municipality uses decision rules. This supports the employee with advice on whether you are entitled to benefits.Last change on 18th of July 2024, at 15:05 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, IAMA
- Status
- In use
- When implementing the Participation Act, it is important to determine on the basis of the correct standard what benefit (amount) the resident in question is entitled to. The application of an algorithm ensures that this is done correctly and efficiently.Last change on 12th of July 2024, at 9:42 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, ...
- Status
- In use
- Being able to better carry out the process of issuing permits for splitting houses prevents unlawful and undesirable housing situations in UtrechtLast change on 18th of November 2024, at 11:03 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, ...
- Status
- Out of use