Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Allocation of Additional Earnings Reward
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
- Social Security
- Work
- Public finance
Begin date
Contact information
Link to publication website
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Extra work rewards the municipality of Arnhem with extra money. The additional earnings reward is accrued when a resident on welfare benefits works part-time. This scheme is a two-year trial and will last until July 2025.
The resident does not have to apply for this trial. The additional earning reward will automatically receive the resident through an algorithm when they submit a payslip showing the salary.
The additional earnings reward is paid twice a year (March and September) when the resident receives a Participation Act (PW) benefit. The additional earnings reward is paid once a year (September) when the resident receives IOAW/IOAZ benefits.
The additional earning reward does not affect the level of the resident's benefit. Even if the part-time work ceases, the resident retains the benefit. Accrual of the additional-earning reward stops, but the benefit continues. Receiving the reward also does not affect the amount of tax benefits.
Considerations
The municipality of Arnhem wants as many people as possible to make the best use of their abilities and participate in society. If a resident is on social assistance benefit, part-time work can be a nice first step to regain familiarity with work. The municipality of Arnhem therefore believes that part-time work on social assistance benefit may be financially rewarded. The money the resident receives does not affect any benefits or taxes the citizen pays. So the resident does not have to worry about this.
Human intervention
The results of the algorithm involve list work that is checked by the administration (in person) at file level and processed in the records. Checking involves human intervention at all times.
Risk management
There are no risks for the resident. The results of the algorithm are always checked and processed by an official. In addition, the money received by the resident does not affect any surcharges or taxes paid by the resident.
Legal basis
- Participation Act
- Older and partially disabled unemployed Persons Income Support Act
- Elderly and partially disabled former self-employed persons Income Support Act
Links to legal bases
- Participatiewet: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0015703/2024-01-01/0
- Wet inkomensvoorziening oudere en gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikte werkloze werknemers: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0004044/2024-01-01/0
- Wet inkomensvoorziening oudere en gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikte gewezen zelfstandigen: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0004163/2024-01-01/0
Operations
Data
Residents with income and welfare benefits provide what they earn monthly with income slips. This data is processed in the administration. The benefit and income are offset and are the basis for determining the additional earnings.
Technical design
The financial data around income and welfare benefits are input for the algorithm. A formula is used to calculate the amount of additional earnings. The output is a list work in the form of a report.
External provider
Similar algorithm descriptions
- Is a house shared by several adults? Then the assistance benefit may change. This is because housing costs can then be shared. But not all housemates count towards the benefit. The Intelligence Agency uses an algorithm to determine this and lets municipalities know if anything changes in the household.Last change on 17th of December 2024, at 12:49 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
- A resident who has been given a prison sentence and is trying to evade it is called a fugitive convict. These residents are not entitled to assistance. Municipalities must check this and, if necessary, stop the assistance benefit after investigation.Last change on 11th of October 2024, at 8:14 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- An assistance recipient can only apply for assistance from the municipality where the resident is registered. For example, as a result of moving house, a person may receive assistance from several municipalities. Stichting Inlichtingenbureau (IB) informs the municipalities about this. The municipalities can then stop unlawful ongoing benefits.Last change on 11th of October 2024, at 8:40 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Based on calculation rules, it is determined which standard should be applied for this resident. More specific information on this algorithm will follow.Last change on 25th of June 2024, at 7:08 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- High-Risk AI-system
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In development
Reinforcement scenario consideration for homes not meeting safety standard
National coordinator Groningen
If homes are not declared at standard, a recommendation for a strengthening scenario is automatically created. The scenario depends on the market value of the current house and the cost of structural strengthening or demolition and new construction.Last change on 20th of December 2023, at 7:54 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use