Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Advisory cycle / Letter on utilisation of long-term care budget framework
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Privacy Quickscan
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
Begin date
Contact information
Link to publication website
Responsible use
Goal and impact
The purpose of the letters is to forecast expenditure under the Wlz for the year in question (year t). The result is a letter in which we explain this forecast and show the extent to which we expect the budget framework to be adequate. An important element of the letter is the report in which we show the comprehensive results of the various scenarios at Wlz administrator level.
The impact is that partly on the basis of the letter sent to the minister, the minister decides on the use of redistribution funds. In addition, the minister may decide partly on the basis of our projections to possibly add other additional resources to (sub-)frameworks.
Considerations
The Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport annually sets the budget framework for the Long-Term Care Act (Wlz). In June of year t-1, VWS indicates the provisional framework for the following year in the Preliminary Framework Letter. The starting point of the framework is always the previous year's framework. This framework is adjusted based on a growth allowance for demographic developments and increasing care severity, expected wage and price developments, and policy changes. In September/October year t-1 follows the Final Wlz Framework Letter in which VWS indicates what the final framework looks like.
The budget framework consists of:
- The contracting space for care in kind (zin);
- The available amount for personal budgets (pgb);
- The reallocation resources: resources that can be used to absorb unexpected shifts in care provided. These resources are withheld by VWS at the start of the year and only deployed when necessary.
At the request of the Minister of VWS, the NZa monitors the utilisation of the Wlz framework. The minister can then decide to deploy the redistribution resources or other additional resources.
Human intervention
The minister can disregard the contents of the letter on the adequacy of the framework and decide independently whether or not to raise the framework. This is a political consideration.
The projections initially made by the NZa are consulted with healthcare offices. Adjustments may follow through 'expert opinions' if outcomes do not seem plausible.
Risk management
The risks in terms of technology, legislation, costs, ethics, explainability and other issues are very limited. The algorithm is not critical, no direct decisions follow from it and the technique is understandable and explainable.
Links to legal bases
Elaboration on impact assessments
A legitimacy assessment has been done on the processes in which this algorithm plays a role according to our standard procedure. The impact on privacy of this algorithm is negligible.
Impact assessment
Operations
Data
The following data sources are used for the advice:
Indications CIZ: Monthly delivery of indications CIZ
Care-in-kind
1. Monthly delivery Vektis Care-in-natural
Personal budget (PGB)
2. Personal budget directly from Vektis monthly, pseudonym not linkable
Waiting list data Care institution Netherlands (ZiNL)
Technical design
The advisory cycle uses data aggregated by care office on a monthly performance basis. This data is further aggregated at Wlz-employer level, from which a time series is produced per Wlz-employer per performance on a monthly basis. An ets model is applied to this time series, predicting the demand for the relevant performance over the months in the year for which an advice is requested.
Tracking the development in PGB costs is done by aggregating the data on a monthly basis per care office and creating a time series from this. An ets model is fitted to this time series, predicting the expected budget required during the year for which advice is sought.
As a second scenario, the advice cycle looks at the growth of indications per care profile over the past year. This growth is extended linearly to predict the growth of the year for which advice is sought. A price tag is attached to the growth of an indication per care profile using the aggregated data obtained from the distribution model. The split of an indication into cashing in ZIN/PGB is done proportionally as the split ZIN/PGB is currently known.
The waiting list data are summarised to provide insight per care office and sector into the waiting status and duration. If necessary, a financial value can be attached to this at the request of the Minister of LZ. A value is then assigned per care profile to the waiting lists from the aggregated data obtained from the distribution model.
External provider
Similar algorithm descriptions
- The algorithm predicts the number of clients who will use youth care in the coming quarters/years.Last change on 6th of March 2024, at 15:36 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In development
- This algorithm, the forecasting model, provides insight into future peak moments at the municipality's Citizen Affairs desks. This allows additional staff to be hired in time for expected peak moments. This model also supports financial planning.Last change on 27th of June 2024, at 13:10 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This page contains information about the algorithm 'Ex officio refund of Healthcare Insurance Act (treaty beneficiaries)'. This algorithm is designed to retrieve tax payroll data for calculating the refund of the wrongly deducted income-related Healthcare Insurance Act contribution to treaty beneficiaries.Last change on 30th of October 2025, at 15:44 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- The algorithm 'Ex officio refund of healthcare insurance contributions (mass)' selects the required data of individuals who will receive a refund or have to make an additional payment via the mass process. In a mass process, the Tax Administration handles tax cases of very many people at the same time. By ex officio, we mean that the Tax Administration does this itself, without an application or request.Last change on 30th of October 2025, at 15:44 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
Algorithm Ex officio refund of healthcare insurance contributions
Dutch Tax and Customs Administration
This page contains information about the algorithm 'Ex officio refund of contributions under the Health Insurance Act (select target group)'. This algorithm provides a selection of people who may be eligible for a refund of the Healthcare Insurance Act contribution.Last change on 30th of September 2025, at 10:54 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use