Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
PlanGuide
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
Begin date
End date
Contact information
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Considerations
Semantic search may inadvertently reproduce existing inequalities stemming from old rules, and users may be inclined to adopt suggested rules more readily. Furthermore, differences in judgement between planning lawyers and a lack of monitoring may lead to inconsistencies or undesirable patterns in the outcomes.
Proportionality
The use of the algorithm offers clear advantages: it speeds up the implementation of local plans, promotes consistency through the reuse of rules, and supports planning lawyers with targeted suggestions via semantic search. The disadvantages lie primarily in the risk of influencing human decisions and the unintended reproduction of existing inequalities. As the system does not make autonomous decisions and the final substantive assessment always rests with the planning lawyer (and subsequently the planning draughtsman), the use of the algorithm is proportionate and reasonably justified.
Measures
No decisions are made within the PlanGids. The suggestions are still assessed by a planning draughtsman outside the system. This serves as an immediate feedback opportunity to check whether the PlanGids is providing the correct suggestions, or whether the Semantic Search needs to be adjusted.
Human intervention
Through the use of semantic search, suggestions are provided to the planning lawyer for translating zoning plan regulations into environmental plan regulations. The planning lawyer then decides for themselves whether any of the suggestions are appropriate for the existing regulation. If this is not the case, the planning lawyer can draft a proposal for a new rule themselves. This proposal is then assessed by a planning draughtsman, who subsequently enters the rule into another system. No decisions are taken within PlanGids.
PlanGids promotes equality by standardising rules, encouraging their reuse and applying them consistently during the transition to a single environmental plan. Automation and collaboration reduce the influence of subjective interpretations and unconscious biases. Furthermore, transparency and traceability ensure that differences in treatment are transparent and can be rectified, thereby combating unjustified discrimination.
Risk management
- The PlanGids uses only publicly available data from local planning schemes and the environmental plan.
- Access to the PlanGids is restricted by personal authorisation based on role or position (only for people working on the translations)
- The PlanGids only provides suggestions; no decisions are made.
- A privacy quick scan has been carried out
Operations
Data
Technical design
The PlanGids uses public data from local planning regulations. Only the planning regulations (Chapter 3) are loaded into a conversion table. In addition, the most recent version of the Environmental Plan is also loaded. Translated rules are stored in a Knowledge Base so that they can be reused.
Model architecture
- Zoning plan regulations (Chapter 3 of the zoning plan) are loaded into a conversion table.
- The most recent version of the Environmental Plan is loaded from a public source.
- Translated rules are stored in a Knowledge Base
Semantic search allows users to search the Knowledge Base for specific zoning plan rules.
For each search result, the user can see the extent to which it matches the search term (expressed as a percentage). Search results and the translation ultimately selected are logged, enabling monitoring of whether adjustments to settings are necessary.
Similar algorithm descriptions
Model system for the Climate Scenarios for the Netherlands
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute
This system helps KNMI understand how the climate is changing in the Netherlands and on the BES islands (Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba). To this end, KNMI produces climate scenarios: clear stories and figures about how the climate may change in the future. The KNMI uses this knowledge to inform society and provides advice and warnings about the consequences of climate change.Last change on 1st of October 2025, at 7:41 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This page contains information about the algorithm 'Experiment Early Warning WGS1'. The algorithm implements the ministerial regulation of 15 May 2025 drawn up under the Municipal Debt Relief Act in connection with a joint experiment by the Tax and Customs Administration, the Benefits Agency and 10 municipalities to identify and help people in arrears earlier.Last change on 21st of April 2026, at 13:10 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- When implementing the Participation Act, it is important to determine, based on the right standard, which arrangement the resident in question is in. The application of an algorithm ensures that this is done correctly and efficiently.Last change on 5th of September 2025, at 13:04 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Uthiek, DPIA
- Status
- In use