Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
AI desk Participation Act (Schulink)
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
- Social Security
- Work
- Health and Healthcare
Begin date
Contact information
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Better service: residents are helped faster because AI allows employees to quickly search the many sources of laws, regulations and internal policies.
Considerations
With this application, we improve our services because we can help residents faster. It also saves a lot of time for our staff, who can now focus more on their core tasks. Employees no longer have to consult all regulations (local and national) separately, reducing the chances of something being overlooked. AI also sometimes gives incomplete or wrong answers, but we always retain human intervention. We also invest in the AI literacy of our staff. These efforts keep the risks down and the benefits far outweigh the risks.
Human intervention
There is always a staff member who checks, reviews and corrects AI desk responses where necessary. The AI desk never communicates directly with residents.
Risk management
Employees working with the AI desk receive training to use the correct prompts. This teaches them never to enter personal or other pricacy-sensitive data into the AI desk. They are also trained on how to check the AI desk's responses. In addition, there is organisation-wide basic training naming the risks of AI.
Legal basis
The AI desk is only used in internal processes and does not make decisions without human intervention. A legal basis is therefore not required.
Operations
Data
External provider
Similar algorithm descriptions
- With the help of AI, the algorithm searches a knowledge base (containing laws, regulations and internal policy documents on the Participation Act) for information relevant to the question asked by the municipal employee. After obtaining the answer, the employee reviews the algorithm's answer and also checks the original documents.Last change on 2nd of February 2026, at 11:33 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, FRAIA
- Status
- In use
- When implementing the Participation Act, it is important to determine on the basis of the correct standard what benefit (amount) the relevant resident is entitled to. The application of an algorithm ensures that this is done correctly and efficiently.Last change on 5th of September 2025, at 13:03 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Uthiek, DPIA
- Status
- In use
- Based on calculation rules, it is determined which standard should be applied for this resident. More specific information on this algorithm will follow.Last change on 8th of July 2025, at 13:25 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- High-Risk AI-system
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In development
Transit address profile National Approach to Address Quality (LAA)
National Authority for Identity Data
The algorithm selects residential addresses on which there were many registrations in the past period: there may be doubts as to whether actual removals have taken place.Last change on 27th of May 2024, at 12:05 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Residents and entrepreneurs of the Noordoostpolder municipality can apply for digital civil affairs products via our website. To process declarations automatically, the system performs checks on the person list, address and attached data.Last change on 30th of May 2024, at 14:45 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use