Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.

Anonymise

The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

Last change on 17th of October 2025, at 9:12 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
Publication category
Other algorithms
Impact assessment
Field not filled in.
Status
In use

General information

Theme

Organisation and business operations

Begin date

Field not filled in.

Contact information

gemeente@asten.nl

Responsible use

Goal and impact

The anonymisation software is used to give substance to transparency on the one hand and the necessary protection of the individuals and companies to whom documents relate on the other.

Considerations

The alternative is manually filing away personal data. That takes too many hours and is less accurate. Increasingly, the municipality has to make information public. Therefore, privacy- or business-sensitive information has to be masked out. Before the algorithm was deployed,anonymisation did not always go correctly. Individuals had their own working methods, so it was not always done adequately and the texts were often still searchable.

Human intervention

The outcome of the algorithm is checked by an employee. The clerk is required by the software to check all pages. The clerk determines whether the document is correctly anonymised.

Risk management

There is no risk of automated decision-making and the algorithm has no impact on fundamental rights because the algorithm does not make decisions with legal consequences. It only suggests anonymising personal data. The algorithm is also used by the developer himself, so errors are quickly found. In addition, the algorithm is trained periodically. If the algorithm does not work well enough, we can make adjustments with black- and whitelists. The municipality's employee always does the final check whether a document is correctly anonymised. There is a risk that employees do not check properly; we mitigate this by paying attention to the importance of carefully checking the personal data found by the algorithm.

Legal basis

Open Government Act and the AVG

Links to legal bases

  • Open Government Act: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0045754/
  • Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:31995L0046
  • General Data Protection Regulation Implementation Act: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0040940
  • Electronic Publications Act: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0043961
  • Digital Government Act: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0048156

Operations

Data

All information found in the uploaded documents (except metadata) is processed by the algorithm. This may include ordinary personal data, special personal data and criminal data. It may also include business-sensitive information.

Technical design

Documents are uploaded to the application by an employee. At that point, a copy is made of the original in the form of a PDF with text layer and the metadata of the original document is removed from the copy. This copy ends up on a Dutch server and remains there for a maximum of 30 days. The text layer of the PDF is offered to the machine learning algorithm through an API. This is a Natural Language Processing algorithm (named entity recognition) from Microsoft Azure. The API returns at which location in the analysed texts a personal data is likely to occur, along with the probability score (a percentage). At that point, Azure immediately removes the text layer. The probability score is used along with vendor-developed proprietary ai models to make the recognition of personal data as accurate as possible. The models are trained using, among others, the following trained datasets as CoNLL-2003, UD Dutch LassySmall v2.8, Dutch NER Annotations for UD LassySmall and UD Dutch Alpino v2.8. Minimum key figures for the accuracy of identifying personal data are as follows: Named entities (precision): 0.78, Named entities (recall): 0.76, Named entities (F-score): 0.77. Finally, a staff member checks the document and when it completes the document, the data to be anonymised is permanently removed from the text layer and a black bar is placed.

External provider

Xxllnc (DataMask)

Similar algorithm descriptions

  • The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

    Last change on 12th of February 2025, at 9:26 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DEDA, DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

    Last change on 16th of September 2025, at 12:34 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

    Last change on 19th of March 2025, at 10:12 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

    Last change on 15th of September 2025, at 10:55 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DEDA, DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • The algorithm underlines personal data in documents. An employee has to look at all pages and check whether the document is properly anonymised. Then the software removes all highlighted information and blacklists it. After that, the documents can be published, for example under the Open Government Act (WOO).

    Last change on 28th of August 2025, at 11:47 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use