Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Target group coding
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- IAMA, DPIA
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
Begin date
Contact information
Link to publication website
Link to source registration
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Get in touch with Rotterdam residents with tax debt in a fast, simple and least expensive way for an appropriate way to collect tax money.
The target group code assigned by the algorithm influences the type of writ of execution. Namely: by post or with a tax bailiff. A tax bailiff ensures that there is contact earlier, so that the Rotterdam resident with tax debt can get help. We call that social debt collection.
Considerations
It depends on the payment behaviour of the Rotterdam resident whether the classification of the target group code increases. The free reminder is an extra service, an opportunity that every Rotterdam resident with a tax debt receives. This is followed by collection costs via a reminder and writ of execution. Due to the collection costs, a Rotterdam resident with a tax debt increases in classification of the target group code. The reasons why the municipality applies the target group code and associated collection strategies stem from a clear objective. Personal contact and social collection are important here.
Human intervention
There is no human intervention up to the bailiff. From the human dimension, a collection officer can prevent a visit from the bailiff. The collection officer does this in consultation with the bailiff. The Rotterdammer does not know its own target group code. From the risks found in the IAMA, the municipality does communicate on the pay-on-time web page.
Risk management
- Human contact is missing
- Correction is only done from municipal systems
- Process is difficult to explain
- No communication about process to citizen
- Rotterdammer does not know his own code
Legal basis
11.5 collection guidelines (free collection) and 1.1.6 collection guidelines (efficient collection)
Impact assessment
- IAMA: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2021/02/25/impact-assessment-mensenrechten-en-algoritmes
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
Operations
Data
Payment history
Technical design
According to the law, a municipality has various measures to collect municipal taxes. The policy of the municipality of Rotterdam is to choose the simplest, fastest and least expensive method. This applies both from the perspective of the Rotterdammer with tax debt and from the municipality. This principle is established in the policy rules (collection guideline). The result of the elaboration of these policy rules are the target group codes with the various measures (collection strategies).
The municipality chooses the best way to quickly get in touch with the Rotterdam resident with tax debt. That is why there are various measures. The municipality looks at the payment behaviour of the past 3 years for this. This is done on the basis of the imposed collection costs: have reminders and/or writs of execution been sent before. The taxpayer is in target group code 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 or 7. The criteria for being in a certain target group are the same for everyone. Every Rotterdam resident with a tax debt receives a free reminder, regardless of the target group code. This is followed by collection costs via a reminder and writ of execution.
Due to the collection costs, a Rotterdam resident with tax debt increases in classification. The target group code has an influence on the type of writ of execution. Namely: by post or with a tax bailiff. A tax bailiff ensures that there is contact earlier, so that the Rotterdam resident with tax debt can get help. We call that social collection.
An employee cannot manually change the target group code.
External provider
Similar algorithm descriptions
- To determine whether you are entitled to benefits, the municipality uses decision rules. This supports the employee with advice on whether you are entitled to benefits.Last change on 18th of July 2024, at 15:05 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, IAMA
- Status
- In use
- The aim of the information service is to help the municipality understand which citizens may be entitled to special assistance, due to incomplete state pension benefits. The algorithm works like a postman, receiving a list of citizens from the SVB, splitting it up and delivering it. So that each municipality receives a list of its own citizens.Last change on 19th of June 2024, at 9:08 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Every year, the Amsterdam municipality determines the WOZ value of all real estate and uses a statistical calculation model to do so.Last change on 21st of November 2024, at 9:11 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- The municipality calculates the WOZ value of each home based on home characteristics and the sales prices of comparable homes. Based on this, homeowners pay property tax.Last change on 18th of July 2024, at 12:50 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
- The algorithm checks whether a Citizen Service Number appears in various applications used by the municipality of Tilburg. Tilburg municipality does this in order to provide the best possible support for the resident and customisation if needed.Last change on 26th of June 2024, at 19:12 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In development