Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.

Algorithm Ex officio refund of healthcare insurance contributions

This page contains information about the algorithm 'Ex officio refund of contributions under the Health Insurance Act (select target group)'. This algorithm provides a selection of people who may be eligible for a refund of the Healthcare Insurance Act contribution.

Last change on 2nd of July 2025, at 11:01 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
Publication category
Impactful algorithms
Impact assessment
Field not filled in.
Status
In use

General information

Theme

Public finance

Begin date

Field not filled in.

Contact information

algoritmeregister@belastingdienst.nl

Link to publication website

https://over-ons.belastingdienst.nl/onderwerpen/omgaan-met-gegevens/algoritmeregister/

Link to source registration

https://over-ons.belastingdienst.nl/onderwerpen/omgaan-met-gegevens/algoritmeregister/algoritme-ambtshalve-teruggave-bijdrage-zorgverzekeringswet/

Responsible use

Goal and impact

The Tax Authority checks withholding agents for correct and complete declaration and payment of payroll taxes. Payroll taxes consist of wage tax, national insurance contributions, employee insurance contributions and the income-related Healthcare Insurance Act contribution. Withholding agents (such as an employer, pension fund or benefits agency) deduct the wage tax and national insurance contributions from their employee's pay; and in some cases the income-related healthcare insurance contribution. They remit this to the tax authorities. The employee insurance contributions and usually the income-dependent healthcare insurance contribution are not deducted from the employee's wage, but are remitted by the withholding agent (employer) itself to the Tax Office.

The employer or benefit agency pays the income-related Healthcare Insurance Act contribution to the Tax Administration. This contribution is a contribution that the employer or benefit agency pays - in addition to the premium to the health insurer - for the health insurance fund. The higher the income, the higher the contribution.

The algorithm helps select individuals who receive income from more than 1 employer. And who may pay more health insurance fund contribution on an annual basis than the legal maximum.

Considerations

Selecting the target group is important to avoid citizens paying too much income-dependent Health Insurance Act contribution. We want to do this carefully. The algorithm can support a Tax Administration employee in this. As a result, the assessment is more careful, efficient and uniform.

Human intervention

Human intervention in the Tax Administration context implies that a competent and knowledgeable employee plays a substantial role in decision-making.

The operation of the algorithm always involves human intervention. The algorithm detects and selects. It is the Tax Administration employee who makes the decision.

Risk management

The General Administrative Law Act (Awb) requires the government's actions to be transparent and lawful. The Tax Administration observes the general principles of good governance when applying and developing algorithms.

The algorithm uses data collected under various tax laws. As required by the AVG, no more data is used than necessary.

The selection rules are reviewed periodically and adjusted if necessary to remain compliant with laws and regulations.

Legal basis

  1. General Administrative Law Act:
  2. General Data Protection Regulation:
  3. Archives Act 1995:
  4. General State Tax Act:
  5. General Data Protection Regulation Implementation Act:
  6. Health Insurance Act:

Links to legal bases

  • Algemene wet bestuursrecht: : https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0005537/
  • Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming: : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/NL/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
  • Archiefwet 1995: : https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0007376/
  • Algemene wet rijksbelasting:: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0002320/
  • Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming:: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0040940/
  • Zorgverzekeringswet:: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0018450/

Elaboration on impact assessments

  • Privacy and AVG

The use of data is tested against the General Data Protection Regulation (AVG). Reviewing personal data reveals any privacy risks and allows appropriate measures to be taken.

The AVG prescribes that no more data should be used than necessary. This is called data minimisation. The Tax Administration regularly examines whether the data used are still necessary and may therefore be used.


  • Use of special personal data

No use of special personal data is made within this algorithm.


  • Equality and non-discrimination

The algorithm is assessed in line with applicable non-discrimination principles for direct and indirect discrimination. Processing as little personal data as possible reduces the risk of direct discrimination. Employees involved in developing and managing the algorithms receive training on data protection and bias.

Operations

Data

  • Identifying data (Social security number, LH number)
  • Health insurance law data

Links to data sources

  • Identificerende gegevens (Sofinummer, LH-nummer): Belastingdienst
  • Zorgverzekeringswet gegevens: Belastingdienst

Technical design

The algorithm consists of selection rules created by content experts based on laws, regulations and expertise.

The algorithm is not self-learning. This means that the algorithm does not develop itself during its use.

External provider

The algorithm was developed by Tax Administration staff and is also maintained internally.

Similar algorithm descriptions

  • Due to the underwriting obligation, a health insurer may incur higher healthcare costs if it has a proportionately higher number of insured who need a lot of care. To ensure a level playing field between health insurers, risk equalisation exists. By means of risk equalisation, insurers with higher healthcare costs are financially compensated for this.

    Last change on 24th of October 2024, at 14:11 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • The algorithm helps the CIZ employee choose the care profile that best suits the client's care needs. A care profile states what care a person needs.

    Last change on 31st of October 2024, at 16:40 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Impactful algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • We use an algorithm to determine whether someone is entitled to AOW (General Old Age Pensions Act) and how much money that person will receive. This algorithm follows fixed rules.

    Last change on 28th of October 2024, at 10:25 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • The 'Calculate Care Allowance' algorithm uses care allowance rules to calculate the right to and the amount of care allowance. This is done with health insurance data from and about the applicant and the allowance partner.

    Last change on 26th of March 2025, at 15:54 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Impactful algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DPIA
    Status
    In use
  • Assets can affect the right and amount of a benefit. Stichting Inlichtingenbureau (IB) establishes whether a person on social assistance benefit has assets above the set limit (tax-free assets). If so, IB issues a signal about this to the municipality.

    Last change on 7th of March 2025, at 10:25 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Impactful algorithms
    Impact assessment
    DPIA
    Status
    In use