Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.

Sampler

If a lawyer/mediator applies for subsidised legal aid for a citizen, this must be substantiated with documents. To speed up the process, a procedure has been devised whereby applications for an addition or declaration are granted automatically. This is checked afterwards by means of a random check.

Last change on 3rd of February 2025, at 8:51 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
Publication category
Other algorithms
Impact assessment
DPIA
Status
In use

General information

Theme

Law

Begin date

2009

Contact information

algoritme@rvr.org

Link to publication website

https://www.rvr.org/advocaten/ingeschreven/high-trust/

Responsible use

Goal and impact

The Legal Aid Board has developed a working method for lawyers and mediators to reduce administrative burdens. This working method is based on mutual trust. Additions and declarations are automatically granted to the lawyers and mediators who use it. There are various ways of checking this, random sampling being one of them. This publication relates to the algorithm behind the random sampler.


Purpose sampler

In this collaborative relationship with lawyers and mediators, it is assumed that the office takes responsibility for properly applying the rules under the Legal Aid Act. To check whether offices have applied the rules properly and have not received too much (or too little) subsidy, a random check is carried out.


The aim of the random checker is to select a number of random cases per office over a certain control period. Depending on the quantity of cases, the check takes place once a year, six months or quarterly. A control period is never skipped. Using the random sampler in Excel, random cases are selected to be checked. The quantity of cases selected should yield 10% of the total number of cases, with a minimum of 20 cases.


Once a sample has been drawn, an employee of the Legal Aid Board checks the cases substantively. The process on how to proceed is beyond the scope of this publication.


Impact

The sampler only has an impact on selecting cases from a given period.

Considerations

The advantage of using the sampler is that it ensures independence and uniformity. Legal Aid Board employees have no influence on the selection of cases in the sample.


An alternative could be that a Legal Aid Board employee manually selects offices and cases, possibly resulting in certain offices or cases being selected more often than other offices.


The use of the sampler prevents cases from being selected on an arbitrary basis.

Human intervention

The algorithm is used to select random files. After this, an employee checks whether the sample was conducted correctly. Among other things, the check sees if the right amount of cases have been selected to meet the minimum standard for a successful sample selection. These requirements are set out in an internal protocol.

Risk management

The established protocol can only be amended with the approval of the management team.


In addition, any change to the general terms and conditions of this working method is always preceded by consultation with the Netherlands Bar Association and the Mediators' Federation of the Netherlands.

Legal basis

Article 7(3)(c) Legal Aid Act

Links to legal bases

Artikel 7 lid 3 sub c Wet op de rechtsbijstand: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0006368&hoofdstuk=II&afdeling=2&artikel=7&z=2024-07-01&g=2024-07-01

Impact assessment

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Operations

Data

- start date sample period

- sample end date

- high-trust start date

- office name lawyer/mediator

- client number/file number

- litigant name

- case code

Technical design

Random sampling takes place with a VBA script in Excel that randomly selects cases. Each time a new query is made, new cases/declarations are selected.

The technical operation behind the sampler takes into account the amount of the fee. A high fee is more likely to be in the sample than a low fee. All cases with a fee higher than EUR 3,500 are added to the sample in any case.

Once the (initial) sample is drawn, it is checked whether at least two cases of each lawyer/mediator within the firm are in the sample. If this is not the case, additional cases targeted at these lawyers/mediators are added to the sample in an additional process until this minimum number is reached.

Similar algorithm descriptions

  • This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for inspection based on risk. It uses declaration data from companies and looks at whether or not there are increased risks of importing and exporting opium act drugs for which an exemption has been granted.

    Last change on 17th of December 2024, at 10:56 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Impactful algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • Residents and entrepreneurs of the municipality of Urk can apply for citizenship products digitally via our website. To process declarations automatically, the system performs checks on the person list, address and attached data.

    Last change on 18th of December 2023, at 9:01 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for control based on customs declarations and risks. It uses declaration data from companies and considers whether or not there are risks of bringing in raw materials (precursors) or mixtures that can be misused for the illegal manufacture of explosives.

    Last change on 10th of December 2024, at 9:54 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Impactful algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • Residents and entrepreneurs will have the opportunity to apply for citizenship products digitally via the municipal website. To process declarations automatically, the system performs several checks.

    Last change on 12th of June 2024, at 6:52 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use
  • One of the tasks of the Justice Information Portal (Injus) is to inform municipalities and/or the Public Prosecutor's Office (OM) when a detainee's detention begins/ends for certain categories of cases or when the detainee goes on leave.

    Last change on 30th of January 2025, at 7:29 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
    Publication category
    Other algorithms
    Impact assessment
    Field not filled in.
    Status
    In use