Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Electors
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA, ...
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
Begin date
Contact information
Responsible use
Goal and impact
For a specific election, automatically selecting all persons entitled to vote from among the residents as registered in the municipality's Basic Registration of Persons (BRP). And thus determine for the various types of elections (e.g. House of Representatives, Provincial Council, Municipal Council) which Utrecht residents are eligible to vote at the relevant election.
Considerations
Results Uthiek Assessment: by determining Utrechters entitled to vote in elections, we contribute to the democratic functioning of our public administration. In doing so, we fulfil the value of Autonomy, by giving Utrechters the right to vote. Data analysis takes place in a secure, responsible and protected manner. This fulfils the values of Privacy and Technology Control. Everyone entitled to vote can therefore vote in the election concerned, regardless of their personal situation or context. In doing so, we give substance to the value Human Dignity.
Without the use of an algorithm, this selection cannot be made within the time limit specified in the Elections Act (1 day). Also, a selection of around 75% of the total number of inhabitants is qualitatively better made with an algorithm than by hand.
Human intervention
The algorithm (with a direct impact on Utrecht residents and their living environment) only serves as a source of information for an employee, who takes the appropriate next step based on this information and the context of the situation. This principle is included in our Utrecht framework Internal Guidelines for Algorithm Application.
Risk management
The Utrecht data scientists, Information and Process Advisors (IPA) and Decentralised Information Security Officers (DISO) within the Utrecht municipality have a controlling and monitoring role in the application of the algorithm, in addition to the employees directly involved. By doing so, we want to prevent the following risks from occurring:
- data leak by making personal data of Utrecht residents publicly available
- algorithm takes a decision completely independently, without the intervention of an employee and without interpreting the relevant context of the situation
- 'function creep' regarding data in the application of the algorithm, causing the algorithm to give a distorted picture of what is going on. This can occur because the same type of data is used when applying the algorithm, and the algorithm uses that as confirmation of what comes out as information
Legal basis
Elections Act sections D1 and J7
Links to legal bases
Impact assessment
- Utrechts Uthiek Assessment
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
Operations
Data
The application of the algorithm within this process uses the following data of Utrecht residents from the BRP, among others:
- nationality
- age
- duration of residence permit
- registration European Right to Vote for non-Dutch EU nationals at an EU election
- date of registration in the municipality
This determines whether Utrecht residents are entitled to vote at the relevant election. The requirements per election (e.g. House of Representatives, Provincial Council, Municipal Council) differ in practice.
Similar algorithm descriptions
- Determining which residents are eligible to vote in elections. More specific information regarding this algorithm will follow.Last change on 25th of June 2024, at 7:09 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- High-Risk AI-system
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In development
- The algorithm selects potential high-risk addresses on which several people with residential addresses are registered in the Basic Registration of Persons (BRP), who are not first-degree relatives of each other.Last change on 27th of May 2024, at 12:04 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Residents who do not have sufficient income or assets themselves usually receive benefits. The municipality of Rotterdam investigates whether the benefits that residents receive are legitimate and still correspond to their current situation. The algorithm that supported the selection for these re-examinations has not been used since the beginning of 2022.Last change on 18th of July 2024, at 12:37 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- High-Risk AI-system
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- Out of use