Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Sanctions
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
Begin date
Contact information
Link to publication website
Link to source registration
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Algorithms help with difficult decisions where many things matter. As a result, we make fewer mistakes. The system treats everyone in the same situation the same way. A fine often affects you financially. In addition, a fine also has emotional consequences, sometimes more than repaying money. A fine also affects how you have to repay. Debts are common.
Considerations
This is an algorithm that follows rules to automatically implement the legislation for penalties for Child Benefit, AOW, ANW, AIO and remigration as much as possible. The law determines what data we are allowed to use.
Human intervention
If the algorithm cannot automatically process an application for Child Benefit, AOW, ANW, AIO and remigration, the process stops and employees take over the file. We call this customisation. This only works by working with standards, processes and protocols. Usually, citizens automatically get what they are entitled to. But sometimes there are special situations where the standard is not enough. For instance, when citizens or society are unintentionally disadvantaged when implementing laws and regulations. We call this professional bellyaching. As a public service provider, society expects us to apply the human touch. This means that our services must match what citizens need and what they are entitled to. We take into account citizens' individual circumstances and the intention of the law. Sometimes customisation is necessary because a process does not fit the citizen's specific situation. Improving service delivery is a task for the entire government. We work together to provide a complete response to social developments and citizens' needs.
Risk management
The sanctioning process is one of SVB's core processes. The entire organisation is set up accordingly. We recognise standard three-lines-of-defence (3LoD model). The first line is supported by various tools in quality thinking and acting and continuity risk management. The second line consists of departments such as Operational control, Risk management, Quality Assurance and Information Security, which perform and report on quality and performance controls. The third line consists of the audit serves that perform scheduled and unscheduled audits.
Legal basis
The penalty task is laid down in the AOW, ANW, AIO legislation and Remigration legislation
Elaboration on impact assessments
For all sub-processes and deliverable information products within this domain, DPIAs are mandatory since the introduction of the AVG, in which purpose limitation and proportionality are established. So there are multiple DPIAs per domain.
Impact assessment
Operations
Data
Our main sources are your data in our systems.
Technical design
Decision tree (rule-based). In your pension, benefit or child benefit, we may give a sanction in some cases. A sanction is a fine or measure. We may give a sanction if, for example, you fail to communicate a change. A decision tool helps our staff assess whether we need to impose a penalty or measure. And how high the fine is or how long the measure lasts. Here, we look at: the amount you overpaid, how long you overpaid, the date the report came in, the date the report should have come in.
Similar algorithm descriptions
Detecting risks in customs declarations for compliance with authorisation requirement of chemicals
Customs
This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for control based on risk. It uses declaration data from companies and considers whether or not there are increased risks of importing and exporting chemicals intended for use as drug precursors.Last change on 17th of December 2024, at 10:55 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This algorithm is performed under the Control of Legal Entities Act (Wcr) after a relevant change in a legal entity. This involves determining the probability of the presence of abuse of the legal entity. Legal entities with the highest probability of abuse are manually assessed for risk.Last change on 20th of March 2024, at 10:23 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for control based on customs declarations and risks. It uses declaration data from companies and considers whether or not there are increased risks of money laundering and terrorist financing for cash and valuables entering or leaving the European Union.Last change on 9th of December 2024, at 14:05 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
Detect tax risks in customs declarations regarding anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed
Customs
This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for inspection based on risk. It uses declaration data from companies and considers whether or not there are risks of inaccuracies in the declarations for the purpose of determining correct financial measures and duties (including anti-dumping and countervailing duties).Last change on 9th of December 2024, at 15:02 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This algorithm helps Customs to select goods for inspection based on risk. It uses declaration data from companies and considers whether or not there are increased risks of inaccuracies in the declarations for the purpose of determining correct financial measures and levies (including import duties and VAT).Last change on 9th of December 2024, at 13:42 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use