Please note: The algorithm descriptions in English have been automatically translated. Errors may have been introduced in this process. For the original descriptions, go to the Dutch version of the Algorithm Register.
Risk prioritisation tool (RPI)
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
General information
Theme
- Nature and Environment
- Public Order and Safety
Begin date
Contact information
Responsible use
Goal and impact
Deploy surveillance capacity to the companies with the most environmental relevance and where it is estimated that there is a higher likelihood of violations. This algorithm is used to prioritise preventive controls. Inspections are also carried out outside this model, for example in response to nuisance complaints.
Considerations
The algorithm ensures that more information is taken into account in determining surveillance priorities. As a result, choices are made more objectively. Supervisors have the freedom to carry out checks based on their own observations in deviation from the algorithm. Additionally, coordinators can override the algorithm by manually prioritising a check.
Human intervention
Supervisors check the highest-priority companies, but feedback experiences to the coordinators, which may lead to adjustment of the algorithm. Additionally, the results are analysed and, based on the results of the analysis, the algorithm is improved.
Risk management
Create awareness among the users of the model of the model's (im)possibilities and there is peer-review with other environment departments using the same or a similar model.
Legal basis
Environment Act
Links to legal bases
Elaboration on impact assessments
The Zwolle municipality ethics committee will reflect on the RPI and its use.
Operations
Data
For compliance behaviour, we look at data from our own case system and data from Inspectieview (external source).
For environmental relevance, data from the company's own case system, the National Waste Notification Office (external source), the SCIOS register (external source), the KIWA register (external source), the Chamber of Commerce (external source), the BAG (external source) and the RVO energy-saving obligation (external source) are used.
The elapsed time since last inspection is extracted from the in-house case system.
Technical design
The time elapsed since the last inspection is simply extracted from its own case system. For compliance and environmental relevance, data that say something about compliance or environmental relevance are extracted from the above-mentioned data sources. These data are converted into variables, each of which has its own weighting factor. For example, for compliance behaviour, the results of previous inspections are also taken into account. For environmental relevance, the variables considered include energy consumption, waste issued and environmental category.
External provider
Similar algorithm descriptions
- The risk prioritisation scores companies based on compliance behaviour, environmental variables and the latest controls. The higher a company is on the list, the earlier it is eligible for inspections which can have an impact on any occurrences on humans and the environment.Last change on 3rd of April 2024, at 13:50 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- Risk prioritisation scores companies based on objective compliance behaviour, environmental relevance and time lapse since last inspection. The higher a company is on the list, the higher the estimated probability of violations and the impact of any incidents on people and the environment.Last change on 3rd of May 2024, at 8:06 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Other algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- The SVB conducts surveys focused on risk. This involves using algorithms to create risk profiles. If a citizen falls into a risk profile, they can be selected for a check by an employee of the Prevention & Enforcement Department.Last change on 29th of October 2024, at 8:06 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- DPIA
- Status
- In use
- The prioritisation scores companies based on data from notifications submitted to the RFO under the energy saving information obligation.Last change on 9th of September 2024, at 9:42 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use
- This algorithm creates a risk sorting of educational institutions (schools, courses or school boards) to conduct targeted desk research, as part of the annual performance and risk analysis.Last change on 22nd of May 2024, at 8:41 (CET) | Publication Standard 1.0
- Publication category
- Impactful algorithms
- Impact assessment
- Field not filled in.
- Status
- In use